Government Accountability Project

Protecting Corporate, Government & International Whistleblowers since 1977

Health Concerns in BP's Own Manual Raise Questions

E-mail Print PDF

Anonymous Whistleblower Provides Document;
Groups Send Letter as Settlement Looms

BPManual(Washington, DC) – Today, GAP and the Louisiana Environmental Action Network (LEAN) sent a joint letter to British Petroleum (BP) America's Ombudsman Program, seeking an explanation for a resource manual provided by an anonymous source that details health risks for Deepwater Horizon spill cleanup workers from both the five million gallons of oil, and the two million gallons of toxic dispersant.

The manual, "Deepwater Horizon MC252, Vessels of Opportunity Near Shore Oil Recovery Groups, Vessel Captains Hazard Communication" (available here) demonstrates apparent contradictions between BP's official written warnings about the oil dispersant, on the one hand, and its statements to the public on the other. The discrepancies pertain to verbal claims that exposure to COREXIT, the dispersant selected by BP and approved by the EPA to treat the oil, was safe, and the health problems actually associated with COREXIT listed in a BP manual.

The letter asserts:

To illustrate our concerns, BP has aerially sprayed or otherwise released over two million gallons of COREXIT as the primary dispersant in the spill's cleanup. BP and contractors have reassured cleanup crews that COREXIT is as safe as Dawn dishwasher soap. However, the manufacturer's Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) included in the manual indicate that the dispersants utilized contain hazardous ingredients such as 2 butoxyethanol, petroleum distillates, and sulfonic acids. The specific petroleum distillates and sulfonic acids within COREXIT EC9257A and EC9500A have never been disclosed to the public.

The manual lists symptoms of exposure, such as damage to the central nervous system, chemical pneumonia, upper respiratory problems and injury to the kidney, liver or red blood cells (hemolysis). Further, the manual recognizes that crude oil contains benzene and other hazardous chemicals that can cause cancer.

The BP manual states that COREXIT is a chronic and acute health hazard under EPA standards, and its toxicity is so severe that special protective equipment and clothing are necessities. But LEAN and GAP have received numerous reports that when cleanup workers sought additional safety equipment, such as respirators donated by LEAN, they were threatened with termination.

GAP Legal Director Tom Devine commented, "BP public statements and private reassurances are schizophrenic. This company needs to come clean with the truth about its cleanup. Did it knowingly abandon public health and occupational safety?"

"This is about protecting people's lives. There is no room for unclear communication or restricted information when it comes to protecting human health," adds Marylee Orr, Executive Director of the Louisiana Environmental Action Network.

The associated symptoms listed in the BP manual mirror the health problems experienced by cleanup workers from the 1989 Exxon Valdez spill, but legal settlements have obliged the courts to seal those health records, so neither the public nor the BP cleanup workers can access them. In the meantime, the fate of these BP workers could be determined any day. The largest environmental trial in US history, scheduled to begin last Monday, was delayed in the 11th hour due to negotiation developments between BP, plaintiff attorneys and the Department of Justice. The trial has been rescheduled for Monday, March 5.

The letter concludes "If statements to the public and work force cannot be reconciled, we seek your explanation for BP's repeated denials of any intentional action that could have threatened public health and safety."

The Louisiana Environmental Action Network (LEAN) has been actively monitoring BP's cleanup efforts and health problems since the spill, and GAP has been conducting a whistleblower investigation since last August.

 

Shanna Devine is Legislative Campaign Coordinator for the Government Accountability Project, the nation's leading whistleblower protection and advocacy organization.

 

Comments (2)

  1. It appears then, that the lack of protective covering for you was because if people saw you in respirators and protective covering...that it would be filmed, raise an issue that things "are" dangerous, and create even more public concern and negative sentiment against BP.

    The growing sentiment this month against BP is growing because more and more of you are sick, and your voices are reaching us all over the country. You are to be applauded for speaking your voice (since this is still America and a free country, that at lease we have).

    There is great empathy growing with the mounting stories of sickness, and all the dead sea life that is still coming ashore.

    There is no amount of money that can bring back these innocent lives of the sea, and a destroyed eco system.

    This isn't just the United States of America. For God's sake..this is a planet...we are all connected.

    When you said thank you for listening...are you on facebook? So many victims are and there is the Plantiff Steering Committee that is encouraging to victims to bring all their stories forward. The plantiff steering committee is encouraging all people to get their stories to them.

    There is this survey now that has to be in I think by tomorrow...here is the link:
    Pre and Post DWH Disaster Health Survey
    www.surveymonkey.com

    Your stories all bear great merit...and your health, and the health of your families must be fully restored.
    God Bless you all and let your voices lead you to a better tomorrow! :-)
  2. We were told by the onsite safety inspector in Port St. Joe, Florida the boom we were handling was void of any chemicals and we had NO respirators on site. However the petroleum stench was in the air as we pressure washed the floating boom and breathed in the mist. The water run through the pressure washer was from the sewage treatment facility next door to the Decon area we found out at the end of the job. We later found out that breathing this mist 12 hours a night, 7 days a week could lead to hepatitis and definite health problems. We were also told during our employment that if we were seen wearing even self obtained breathing protection we would be terminated at once. There were camera crews on the bridge overlooking the site and wearing protective breathing might send up a red flag meaning the air was unsafe for us to breathe and alarm the residents in the neighborhood adjacent to the decon site. When we removed our work clothing after each shift it had to be soaked in a wash tub to let the oil float to the top so we didn't run all of it through the washing machine and contaminate the next load. A lot of the workers carried their clothes to laundromats instead of washing them in their machines at home. The chemical and petroleum smell could not be removed with any amount of washing. We were soaking wet for our 12 hour shift from start to finish. We all suffered headaches, skin rashes, breathing irratation and some people were spitting up blood. Every worker saw this. I have reported this ( and there's a WHOLE LOT more ) to no less than 2 dozen State of Florida and Federal Agencies over the past 2 years including BP and Nothing has ever been done. A couple of us have spoken to a gentleman writing a book called " BP Oil Spill - BEHIND THE SCENE " . Maybe when it's released the right person will read it, and something will be done. There are a LOT of people who worked on the oil spill for the right reasons, were lied to, and are very sick now because of misinformation that may have been given to them that came from the very top. I have advised everyone who has contacted me to hire an attorney other than the ones everybody has been reading about that are " GOING AFTER BP ". That's all a DOG & PONY SHOW. They are ALL connected to BP. They all went to law school together. Thank you for listening. Lon Maxwell and Christopher Irons.

      • >:o
      • :-[
      • :'(
      • :-(
      • :-D
      • :-*
      • :-)
      • :P
      • :\
      • 8-)
      • ;-)

    •