On April 7, all but one of the U.S. House Republican members from Texas voted for H.R. 910 to prevent EPA from regulating greenhouse gases. The vote came immediately after Texas experienced its driest March on record, and as nearly 98% of the state is experiencing drought conditions — including 60% in “severe” drought and 5% in “exceptional” drought (the most extreme category). By April 8, the Texas Forest Service warned that critical drought conditions, high temperatures and high winds are combining to create a perfect storm for wildfire. On April 9, the Texas Forest Service responded to 16 fires that burned 65,181 acres, and said in a press release that wildfire weather conditions could shape up to be among the worst in Texas history.
Earlier CSW post: Ben Santer on the attribution of extreme weather events to climate change
The following is reposted from the World Wildlife Fund climate blog:
Published by Nick Sundt on Sun, 04/10/2011 – 15:44
On Thursday 7 April 2011, all but one of the Republican members of the U.S. House of Representatives from Texas voted for H.R. 910 to prevent the Environmental Protection Agency from regulating greenhouse gases. One Texas Republican (Rep. Michael Burgess) abstained and one Texas Democrat (Rep. Henry Cuellar) also supported the measure. The measure passed the House (255 Ayes, 172 Nays), with no Republicans voting against it. They were joined by 19 Democrats.
EPA’s authority to regulate greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act rests on an “endangerment finding” (Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases under the Clean Air Act [PDF]) that determined that emissions of those gases threatens the health and welfare of Americans with a wide range of impacts, including more frequent and severe droughts and wildfires. See our 23 March post, In Texas Field Hearing, House Subcommittee To Attack EPA as State Faces Another Year of Devastating Drought, for additional details on what the EPA had to say about drought and wildfires.
Drought Intensifies and State Climatologist says it is likely that drought frequency and severity will increase
The vote came immediately after Texas experienced its driest March on record (see first figure below); and as nearly 98% of the state is experiencing drought conditions — including 60% in “severe” drought and 5% in “exceptional” drought (the most extreme category) (see second figure below).
The National Drought Summary from the National Drought Mitigation Center on 5 April reports:
“The first USDA [U.S. Department of Agriculture] soil moisture reports are out and they dont paint a pretty picture, with 86% of Oklahoma showing short or very short topsoil moisture conditions. Texas is reporting 90% short/very short as well. Other statistics provided by the National Weather Service (Austin/San Antonio WFO) show that Del Rio has reported only 0.31 inches of precipitation for October-March, the 2nd driest since 1906. Austin reported its 5th driest October-March since 1856 and San Antonio came in as the 12th driest October-March since 1871.”
Conditions are likely to deteriorate further. The U.S. Seasonal Drought Outlook issued on 7 April and valid through June 2011 indicates that drought is likely to persist or intensify in Texas.
And in the long term? The Texas State Climatologist, John W. Nielsen-Gammon, says it is likely that drought frequency and severity will increase in Texas (from Chapter 2. The Changing Climate of Texas in (The Impact of Global Warming on Texas, 2nd edition, Edited by Jurgen Schmandt, Judith Clarkson and Gerald R. North).
Texas Forest Service: “A Perfect Storm for Wildfire”
By Friday (, 8 April 2011), the Texas Forest Service warned that “critical drought conditions, high temperatures and high winds are combining to create a perfect storm for wildfire.” On Saturday, the Texas Forest Service responded to 16 fires that burned 65,181 acres, and it said in a press release (Wildfire Weather Imminent for Sunday, 9 April 2011) that wildfire weather conditions today (Sunday) “could shape up to be among the worst in Texas history.” It added:
“Key weather factors include pervasive drought conditions, sustained winds of 30 – 35 mph – gusting up to 50 mph, high temperatures and low relative humidity. These weather conditions along with record-dry vegetation increase the potential for wildfires not only starting but also spreading quickly.”
Early this morning, the National Weather Service issued a “red flag warning” for “all of the south plains…rolling plains… And extreme southern Texas panhandle …damaging wildfires possible as an ongoing regional wildfire outbreak is likely to intensify this afternoon.”
While this particular outbreak will eventually subside, the rest of the fire season promises more of the same. In its Wildland Fire Outlook April through July 2011, the National Interagency Fire Center on 1 April said that “[a]bove normal significant fire potential will spread north and west to encompass approximately the southeastern half of Arizona and persist over much of New Mexico into west Texas for May through July.”
After wildfires in late February burned over 88,000 acres and destroyed 58 homes in Western Texas, Texas Forest Service spokesman Lewis Kearney said: “With the drought pattern Texas has had, fire season now is almost running 12 months out of the year. I mean that’s not normal.” (see TX Forest Service: More than 86,000 Acres Burned Sunday, KTXS News, 28 Feb 2011)
As we noted in our 23 March posting, Forrest Wilder said on 24 Feb 2011 in the Texas Observer (Rising Seas Could Swamp Some Texas Cities By 2100):
“While Republicans in Congress, led by members of the Texas GOP delegation, work to defund and defang the EPA, climate change and the science of climate marches on. The GOP’s willful suspension of trust in what ever-mounting evidence and dare I say, common sense? tells us is happening to the planet is not just short-sighted. It’s reckless.
Online Resources:
WWF Climate Change Blog:
- In Texas Field Hearing, House Subcommittee To Attack EPA as State Faces Another Year of Devastating Drought 03/23/2011
- U.S. House of Representatives Considers Amendments to Eliminate Support for International Climate Change Assessment . Fri, 02/18/2011
- Texas Congressman in Copenhagen Dismisses Climate Science: “We dont have an icecap in Texas” 12/23/2009
Texas Forest Service:
- 8 April 2011.
- Wildfire Weather Imminent for Sunday. 9 April 2011
- Texans play lead roles in GOP attack on climate regulations in Congress, Texas Climate News, 22 February 2011.
The Strange Case of Ralph Hall, by Chris Mooney at desmogblog.com.
Global Boiling: Population Flight From Growing Desert Of Central Texas, by The Wonk Rooms Brad Johnson.
The Project on Climate Science:
- House Committee Fails to Heed Scientific Evidence of Climate Change. 15 March 2011.
- House Committee Ignores Science, Votes to Handcuff EPA (10 March 2011)
- A science-free Congress? 8 March 2011. Re-posted from Politico.
- Statement of the Project on Climate Science On an attack on the scientific basis for the Clean Air Act by the The Energy Tax Prevention Act. 3 Feb 2011.
- The Importance of Science in Addressing Climate Change. Open letter to Congress from scientists, 1 February 2011.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency:
- EPA Rejects Claims of Flawed Climate Science. Press release (29 July 2010)
- Denial of Petitions for Reconsideration of the Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act
- Decision document: Pre-publication copy of FR Notice (PDF) (217 pp, 536K)
- Preface (PDF) (7 pp, 39K)
- Volume 1: Climate Science and Data Issues Raised by Petitioners (PDF) (166 pp, 1.2MB)
- Volume 2: Issues Raised by Petitioners on EPA’s Use of IPCC (PDF) (84 pp, 368K)
- Volume 3: Process Issues Raised by Petitioners (PDF) (116 pp, 575K)